Benchmarks
331 sources · 1,258 models × 2,980 benchmarks · 155,643 scoresAgenticRL-Bench, from Eigent AI's Env-Lab, tests whether coding agents can do the engineering behind agentic reinforcement learning: training data and environment selection, harness and inference-engine integration, rewards and verifiers, trainers, monitoring and evaluation. Each task is rebuilt from an incident in a real RL run as a Harbor task with a sandbox image, CPU or one to two H100 GPUs, an 8-hour agent budget and hidden verifiers. This is the Verifiable track's 19 tasks, each given 3 independent attempts; pass@1 is the share of the 57 attempts in which every check passes, and an attempt cut short by an infrastructure failure counts as not solved. Scores are for a model in its vendor's coding harness at a fixed effort. The three open-ended tasks, scored in their own units against a base model, are not included.
No signal or difficulty estimate. Too few models have been measured on this benchmark to estimate its difficulty.
| # | Model | Setting | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | max · Claude Code | 14.0 | |
| 2 | Gemini 4 Argon | high · Antigravity | 14.0 | |
| 3 | GPT-6 Astra | max · Codex | 10.5 | |
| 4 | Muse Wonder Full | x-high · Muse Code | 7.0 | |
| 5 | Grok 4.7 | x-high · Grok Build | 1.8 |